Dan Abel wrote:
>
> GIMF:
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/...entry_id=77266
>
> The above article is about a petition drive to put a law on the ballot
> in SF next November, to make circumcision ILLEGAL for other than
> immediate medical necessity. No religious circumcisions.

There's no way it will pass while it still forbids for religious
reasons. The first court to review it will toss it out on the spot.