On Dec 22, 8:36*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:06:03 -0600, Omelet >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >In article >,
> > Cheryl > wrote:
>
> >> On 12/21/2010 10:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> >> > The mother's can do all they want to maintain good genital hygiene while
> >> > the child is young and they have normal access to it. *The problem
> >> > seemed to have been with older boys and young men who were not keeping
> >> > clean or working in situations where it was not possible, like soldiers
> >> > in time of war.
>
> >> I find this explanation suspect. *In the early years of having a boy, no
> >> one used to think about his well-being later in life. It was a ritual to
> >> do it, or family belief, or it wasn't done.
>
> >And consider the millions of years of human evolution where billions of
> >boy babies were not subjected to genital mutilation...
>
> >The human race survived just fine without it.
>
> Multitudes have and still die from penile/cervical cancer... the
> foreskin also greatly promotes all forms of VD... were you in the
> military (not) you'd be far better informed.
>
> Om, you haven't a clue... you don't have a penis, you don't have a
> son, and you're not sexually active, probably not for a very long
> time, and from what/how you think probably never (um, I've never seen
> a dildo made with a foreskin). *The foreskin also greatly interferes
> with sensitivity during all sexual acts for both men and women. *The
> foreskin serves no good purpose whatsoever, it's another of those
> unnecessary vestiges evolution forgot, more like not enough time has
> elapsed for it to fully disappear. *Removal is NOT a mutilation, no
> more than removal of skin tags from eyelids, leaving it is
> irresponsible. *The best analogy is that the foreskin is the male
> hymen, it needs removal. *Every male who has had his foreskin removed
> later in life has said sex was never this pleasurable... every women
> who eventually experiences a circumcised penis says the same, the
> foreskin is like three busted condoms. *The foreskin was necessary
> protection before humans evolved from tree dwellers and still walked
> on all fours. *Probably way back in time the hominoid penis was
> sheathed inside the body except during arousal as with other mammals,
> the foreskin is a vestige of that internal sheath. *If not for modern
> medicine interfering with evolution and given a few more million years
> the foreskin would disappear. *

==
You are an idiot...some of your conclusions are ridiculous.

"Three busted condoms"...Hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha.

What a goon.
==