On Dec 30, 8:15*pm, Wayne > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 6:30*pm, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 10:22*am, aem > wrote:
>
> > > The L.A. Times' restaurant critic was identified, photographed, and
> > > asked to leave from a new restaurant, which then posted her picture on
> > > a website. *Here's the Times response to the incident, an explanation
> > > of their reviewing policy.http://www.latimes.com/features/food...-restaurants-2...
>
> > > The paper also has a column by her today about the restaurant scene in
> > > L.A. in 2010, as it happens. * *-aem
>
> > Obviously that restaurant won't be open for very long.
> > If they will treat someone who is there to inform others about the
> > menu and service like that....I wouldn't want to eat there at all.
>
> > They just shot themselves in the foot. *IMHO
>
> Some restaurant reviewers are out to lunch. *Recently we had a
> reviewer rave over the Wiener Schnitzel he enjoyed. *He liked it
> because it was thin and crispy. *Since when is a WS thin and crispy?
> They need some meat there, and it should not be soggy or crispy.

Years back, we had a reviewer review our country style restaurant. He
didn't like the Goulash because it had a thin layer of fat on top. I
happen to like it that way. And he raved about our home made apple
pie which was not home made at all, but purchased from a frosted foods
supplier. Bake and serve. Maybe we should have served him borscht
and told him that it was a Latino specialty.