It just struck me the Ad Hominem accusation is being used as a grammar
or spell check flame because anyone can use syntactic isolation to
attach "U talkin bout me". So back to my generalizations you'll never
find the MTV generation in copyright court. It'll become an obsolete
institution when us old fogies with inspiration and imagination pass
on. Since my web browser treats any urls in the ng as a source of the
virus "plagiaristic copyrightus" does anyone have any other copyright
violations to report from the indigenous urls bantered about so
freely. You'll recognize them because they'll be lifted verbatim from
posts not found anywhere else under the guise of public domain but
nothing more than absconding by the lazy to come up with something
different.

Jim

Derek > wrote in message >...
> While intrepidly exploring rec.food.drink.tea, Space Cowboy rolled
> initiative and posted the following:
>
> > You can't infer an individual Ad Hominem accusation from a group
> > reference.

> Absolutely, I can infer an Ad Hominem.