More troll bullshit. Now you are attacking whole generations, next
thing you'll be saying is that blacks and Latinos cant properly taste
Chinese tea because their tastebuds are different? Oh and some guy who
makes a website has to be copying because everything about tea has
already been said by somebody else. Oh and my browser filters better
than yours because I don't go to any websites, why do you even need a
browser then? For that matter why don't you set your newsreader to
filter out any discussion about tea, you don't seem to be interested
in it.

Lamar


On 20 Mar 2004 07:39:13 -0800, (Space Cowboy)
posted:

>It just struck me the Ad Hominem accusation is being used as a grammar
>or spell check flame because anyone can use syntactic isolation to
>attach "U talkin bout me". So back to my generalizations you'll never
>find the MTV generation in copyright court. It'll become an obsolete
>institution when us old fogies with inspiration and imagination pass
>on. Since my web browser treats any urls in the ng as a source of the
>virus "plagiaristic copyrightus" does anyone have any other copyright
>violations to report from the indigenous urls bantered about so
>freely. You'll recognize them because they'll be lifted verbatim from
>posts not found anywhere else under the guise of public domain but
>nothing more than absconding by the lazy to come up with something
>different.
>
>Jim
>
>Derek > wrote in message >...
>> While intrepidly exploring rec.food.drink.tea, Space Cowboy rolled
>> initiative and posted the following:
>>
>> > You can't infer an individual Ad Hominem accusation from a group
>> > reference.
>
>> Absolutely, I can infer an Ad Hominem.