On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:29:27 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:35:40 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:05:11 -0400, L G wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jill will be crawling up your ass for using cream cheese. She's just
>>>>> bitter about everything these days.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know about Jill, but Sheldon will certainly have something to
>>>> say about it.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>>
>>>LG is an idiot. Why on earth would I get upset about cream cheese? I'd
>>>probably have used neuftchatel; less fat
>>
>> The dwarf shouldn't butt into what he knows from nothing... cream
>> cheese is not cheese, not in the biblical sense, unlike other cheese,
>> it's not processed with rennin...
>
>It's still dairy in the "biblical sense", and cannot be mixed with
>meat. Cream cheese is a cheese.
>
>You're like Jerry Sauk - you get to make up your own definitions to
>suit your warped and inconsistent opinions.
>
>> And canned tuna is no longer fish, not in the biblical
>> sense, the processing makes it a cold cut same as canned ham (fresh
>> ham n' swiss is TIAD). Lox too, the process neutralizes its fishdom,
>
>There you go doing it again, tuna and lox are both fish no matter how
>process them. You're just making up definitions to support your
>asinine notions.

You'd best stick to PB & J on Wonder... that encompasses the full
measure of your culinary knowledge.