On May 9, 10:55*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "Catmandy (Sheryl)" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On May 9, 7:08 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>
> > "Roy" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> > >I despise these liquid detergents for hand washing of dishes because
> > > of the high sudsing additives. The P & G and Unilever products are the
> > > worst. Are their low sudsing products available at reasonable prices?
> > > Anyone else having similar experience with liquid dish detergents?
>
> > I use Dawn because it is the best grease cutter I have found. You don't
> > need much of it and it is a low foaming detergent. Plus they donate
> > revenue
> > to wildlife rehabilitation and rescue organizations.
>
> > Paul
>
> Dawn is murder on your hands though and I find Ajax is just as good at
> cutting through the grease.
> And you are paying for those donations... their prices are MUCH higher
> to accomodate their profit margin after the donation is made. And it's
> probably not as much as you might think per bottle. You are better off
> donating on your own to those organizations. I also prefer not to use
> P&G products but that's a story for another day. It's very hard to
> avoid them since they've bought up so many other companies but I try
> to limit my purchases to items that weren't always under P&G's
> umbrella.
>
> P&G is one of the most unethical businesses when it comes to animal testing.
> I boycott all of their products for this reason. *I cannot abide by a
> company that infects 10s of thousands of animals with cancer merely to test
> new formulas for their specialty diets. *I'm no PETA member but I simply
> cannot condone their practices with my patronage.
>
> Paul

You just contradicted yourself. P&G makes Dawn. You said you "use Dawn
because it is the best grease cutter I have found. You don't need much
of it and it is a low foaming detergent. Plus they donate revenue
to wildlife rehabilitation and rescue organizations."

So which is it? Does their donation to wildlife rehab make up for the
animal testing?