On Jul 3, 7:37*pm, Nad R > wrote:

> What I want is food labels that labels the food source that is engineered
> or not. I say let the public decide on what they want. Label the food
> source engineered or heirloom. Give the buyers what they want.


I take no sides, not yet - I'm just a bystander on this one. And
I think I'll be standing a long time.

In the meantime, as one who tends to over-think and sometimes even
enjoys it, I can't help but analyze all situations to find the
positives and the negatives - and no matter how positive something
sounds at the start, my belief is that the negative is sure to follow
and is rarely seen by most till it's too late.

I see the positives in food labeling. But there are negatives.
Some have a positive look. For example, food labeling will open up
new jobs as inspectors are hired to make sure the labeling is not
false, and even more people will be hired to keep an eye on the
inspectors, to make sure they're not lying. An entire industry of
spies will be hired to ensure that the labeling is correct. People
will be paid off to conceal what's really in the product. On the flip
side of that same negative coin, others will be paid to reveal what's
in the product, even if it means they're lying about it just to give
that company a bad name and put it out of business.

It's all corrupt, for god's sake listen to me, we are all doomed to
corruption
TJ - Chief inspector in charge of discipline - anti-corruption Unit
432, North Carolina Regimen, South East Regional