"Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:43:52 -0400, Boron Elgar
> > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 02:33:07 -0700, "Kent" >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"sf" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:23:59 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kent wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>> > "Storrmmee" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > I think that kind of confusion occurs when people top post, a
>>>>> > violation of Net etiquite. Would you please start posting at the
>>>>> > bottom as does everyone else? I inappropriately responded to your
>>>>> > top
>>>>> > posts today on the top.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kent, you've been here long enough to know how stupid that sounds I
>>>>> hope when applied to Lee who is blind and her screen reader top posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> If not, wake up and smell the roses.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> There is a certain cadre of rfc posters who try to make everyone else
>>>> think they are violating some obscure usenet rule if they top post,
>>>> but they are the ignorant ones. I didn't think Kent was one of them,
>>>> but he just proved me wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>SF, look at this. I think this is pretty generally accepted. Lee is the
>>>only poster posting on the top at this time and it does screw up the
>>>thread
>>>now and then.
>>>http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/ne...te.php#toppost
>>>
>>>Kent
>>>
>>Lee has a valid reason for top posting.
>>
>>You, OTOH, have no valid reason for being an asshole.
>
> Actually he does... Kent was born with that defect.
>
> But I don't see the point in Kent's constant bitching about those top
> posts, simply don't open Lee's posts, I rarely do and then only by
> accident... and not because she's a top poster but becaue she *never*
> posts anything about food/cooking, all she does is criticize other's
> personal beeswax... there is absolutely nothing to learn from her... I
> have Lee filed under Non-Entity. Other posters who are abrasive at
> least post some interesting stuff. If both Lee and Kent ran off and
> eloped never to be heard from again I seriously doubt anyone would
> notice they're gone. I actually prefer the more abrasive posters to
> the lobotomized zombies so long as they contribute some on
> topic/interesting information... I can deal with the ball busters.
>
>
This is my first statement about top posting.