Every single one of you who has paid enough attention to thinkthey can second guess a jury is a pathetic loser
On 7/6/2011 9:39 AM, Bryan wrote:
> On Jul 6, 7:40 am, Nancy > wrote:
>> On 7/6/2011 8:26 AM, Bryan wrote:
>>> Now you can go back to watching that episode of Inside Edition that
>>> you Tivoed.
>>
>> You equate watching the justice system in action with watching celebrity
>> gossip? Not surprising.
>
> It's not that much different, and in order to "second guess" the jury,
> you'd have needed to watch the whole thing? Was it televised in its
> entirety?
Yes. It was. There is a great deal of down time during trials, it
didn't involve watching 8 hours a day. Vastly less.
> Maybe I should have compared it to one of the reality TV shows
> instead, but I can bet that that trial has gotten more time on the
> "celebrity gossip" shows than anything else in the past however-long-
> it-has-been-going-on.
That means nothing.
Was it an accident? I don't know. But if the baby's mandible was
in place despite decomp, I believe that duct tape was on her face.
Make of that what you will, it doesn't matter. But it's not your
concern if I spent my time watching the trial or not.
nancy
|