On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:24:56 -0700, "Kent" >
wrote:

>
>"Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:43:52 -0400, Boron Elgar
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 02:33:07 -0700, "Kent" >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"sf" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:23:59 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kent wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>>> > "Storrmmee" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I think that kind of confusion occurs when people top post, a
>>>>>> > violation of Net etiquite. Would you please start posting at the
>>>>>> > bottom as does everyone else? I inappropriately responded to your
>>>>>> > top
>>>>>> > posts today on the top.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kent, you've been here long enough to know how stupid that sounds I
>>>>>> hope when applied to Lee who is blind and her screen reader top posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If not, wake up and smell the roses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> There is a certain cadre of rfc posters who try to make everyone else
>>>>> think they are violating some obscure usenet rule if they top post,
>>>>> but they are the ignorant ones. I didn't think Kent was one of them,
>>>>> but he just proved me wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>SF, look at this. I think this is pretty generally accepted. Lee is the
>>>>only poster posting on the top at this time and it does screw up the
>>>>thread
>>>>now and then.
>>>>http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/ne...te.php#toppost
>>>>
>>>>Kent
>>>>
>>>Lee has a valid reason for top posting.
>>>
>>>You, OTOH, have no valid reason for being an asshole.
>>
>> Actually he does... Kent was born with that defect.
>>
>> But I don't see the point in Kent's constant bitching about those top
>> posts, simply don't open Lee's posts, I rarely do and then only by
>> accident... and not because she's a top poster but becaue she *never*
>> posts anything about food/cooking, all she does is criticize other's
>> personal beeswax... there is absolutely nothing to learn from her... I
>> have Lee filed under Non-Entity. Other posters who are abrasive at
>> least post some interesting stuff. If both Lee and Kent ran off and
>> eloped never to be heard from again I seriously doubt anyone would
>> notice they're gone. I actually prefer the more abrasive posters to
>> the lobotomized zombies so long as they contribute some on
>> topic/interesting information... I can deal with the ball busters.
>>
>>
>This is my first statement about top posting.

You need to consider both sides before fawning at her crotch... Lee's
disability is her 'need to control' personality defect. Lee has
posted here periodically since long before you ever heard of usenet.
She glommed onto her can't-see alibi only as a way to be controlling.
Lee probably has better 'vision' than you, in fact I know she does
with how easily she has maneuvered you. Just becaue someone you've
encountered on the net claims to be defective and begs pity doesn't
mean you need to believe them.