On 30/08/2011 11:12 AM, Tommy Joe wrote:
> On Aug 29, 12:12 pm, Chemo the > wrote:
>
>> the vomit chick hasn't gotten laid in quite some time...hence the
>> attitude.
>
>
> I haven't been laid in a long time either, maybe we would make a
> great couple. The difference between Vomit and Me is that my sexual
> dry spell was entirely by design, not because I can't get laid. It's
> available all the time, but I am older and less inclined to even give
> a shit about such matters. And on those rare occasions when I get the
> urge, I prefer to satisfy them by using porm as opposed to getting
> involved with an actual human being. There is a desire for that to
> happen from time to time, but I know in the long run it's just not
> worth it. I enjoy Vomit's snarly attitude, but sometimes she is too
> cliquish, responding only to those with whom she's corresponded in the
> past, too scared and unsure of herself to try anything new - just like
> me - which is another reason why I think we ought to get together.
> But I want nothing to do with her or any women unless they meet my
> standards, which are very high in the shallow department. From my
> women I demand good looks and high intelligence at the same time, a
> very rare combination. Even then a good sense of humor is required.
> This makes it even less likely. I want my women to be very good
> looking and highly intelligent, but not so intelligent to challenge
> me, just intelligent enough to see my intelligence and comment on it
> in an adoring and praising manner.
>
> The Nephew of God,
> TJ

You actually believe that is a "chick"?

My, you are gullible.