On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>cshenk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
> >>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
> >>>>
> >>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
> >>>
> >>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
> >>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
> >>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
> >>
> >> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
> >> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
> >> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
> >> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > Are you really THAT dense?
>
> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
> done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
>

JL sees the situation clearly.

--

You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts.