"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
...
> "ViLco" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Michel Boucher wrote:
>>
>>> So let me see if I understand. On a post marked clearly OT
>>> and with my name on it, you opened it and clicked on the link
>>> and then, rather than just slapping yourself in the face, you
>>> decide to lash out. You've been here long enough to know the
>>> one rule, the one about not opening what you don't want to
>>> read.
>>
>> If you don't write what the link is about, people CAN NOT know
>> if they want to read it or not, moron
>
> Then don't open it. I didn't say what it was because, frankly it
> is hard to describe...video of man with megaphone on streets of
> London...would that interest you? Satire, or as Lou calls it,
> left-wing radical bullshit and corrupt file (whatever THAT was)?
> Any closer?
>
> It's a youtube link. How many links of videos of cute kittens
> have you clicked on without a full 120 page thesis backing up the
> link?
>
> Specious diatribe...or everyone is cranky these days...
>
> --
Personally I think everyone is just cranky, Michel. I thought it was
hiliarious, especially since it was filmed in an obviously public place
where people were walking about. No one told them they had to stop and
listen to the man with the megaphone. Yet "security guards" tried to get
the man to stop. Why? He wasn't doing anything illegal.

I seem to recall in a couple of the cities I've been to encountering
religious fanatics standing on a corner shouting about God's salavation.
People might have paid more attention to them if they'd had a megaphone and
a camera crew

Jill