"Pico Rico" > wrote in
:

>> Actually, read properly, the expression infers that there is
>> no shit given, so nothing was eaten to produce said output
>> :-p
>
> that is not how constipation works! input, yet sadly, no
> output.

You're assuming constipation. Nothing in the statement suggests
constipation. What it means is that you care even less about
(insert topic) than you do about shit. Has nothing to do with
constipation.

--

If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn’t
help the poor, either we’ve got to pretend that Jesus
was just as selfish as we are, or we’ve got to acknowledge
that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy
without condition, and then admit that we just don’t
want to do it.

Stephen Colbert (via videcormeum)