"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
...
> "Pico Rico" > wrote in
> :
>
>>> Actually, read properly, the expression infers that there is
>>> no shit given, so nothing was eaten to produce said output
>>> :-p
>>
>> that is not how constipation works! input, yet sadly, no
>> output.
>
> You're assuming constipation. Nothing in the statement suggests
> constipation. What it means is that you care even less about
> (insert topic) than you do about shit. Has nothing to do with
> constipation.


wow. get a sense of humor, man!