On 10/27/2011 10:36 PM, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Wait... just how many times *has* someone asked? I only saw you ask once,
> and since my reply to that, I've seen nothing but angry lashing-out.

I asked once, today. The response was that it's a secret, one needs to
know the secret handshake, and riff-raff is not welcome. When one gets
the express message that the undesirables are to be kept out, period,
with no further communication offered, that means that one is one of the
undesirables. Why am I considered as such? I don't know.


> When I made reference to it just a couple days ago, one of the moderators...

One of the moderators? There are moderators here? When did that happen?



> complained that I shouldn't have mentioned it at all, though its existence
> has hardly been a secret. It's listed as an open group. I honestly don't
> remember how I found it.

I know that it's been mentioned, and I've looked for it before. Didn't
find anything then either.



> At any rate, the RFC Facebook group is *not* where the initial announcement
> was made regarding blake's passing.

I know. I merely asked how to find his page. There are many pages under
that name.



> That announcement was made to blake's
> Facebook friends, and some of those friends passed it on to the Facebook
> group -- just as some blake's friends passed the news to *this* group.

I understand that. I have had no problem understanding that, right from
the start. I've also had no problem writing it correctly.

What a shame that this observation of Blake's passing has done nothing
but reveal some r.f.c. members' desire to be a secret society. Go join
the Freemasons for that, for chrissake!