"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> om...
>> On 18/11/2011 10:29 AM, BillyZoom wrote:
>>> On Nov 18, 10:06 am, "Julie > wrote:
>>>> "Dave > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> .com...
>>>>
>>>>> On 18/11/2011 2:43 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I would believe it. Have you not been following her Poor Julie
>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>> flour, no pans, husband buys his own meals in a restaurants.....
>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>> her.... she takes her daughter to restaurants even though the kid
>>>>>>> behaves
>>>>>>> so badly, insulting and abusing her..... but she is still motivated
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> post 50 messages a day in cooking news group.
>>>>
>>>>>> WTF? Now you're making stuff up.
>>>>
>>>>> What part did I make up. Those are all things that you have told
>>>>> us....
>>>>> though your stories tend to evolve.
>>>>
>>>> My husband buys his own meals in restaurants? Where or when did I say
>>>> that?
>>>> I didn't! And I posted one thing about my daughter a long time ago but
>>>> you
>>>> just latched onto that and ran with it.
>>>
>>> "It freaking drives me nuts when my husband calls while I am making
>>> dinner or
>>> just after I have made it to tell me that he won't be home for
>>> dinner. Of
>>> course if he had to work late, I wouldn't be upset. But that's never
>>> the
>>> case. He just decides to go somewhere else on a whim. That leaves me
>>> with
>>> a portion of food that may or may not be eaten on another day. And
>>> most
>>> likely not. Sometimes he does this several days in a row and then he
>>> blames
>>> me for cooking too much food!"
>>>
>>> "That would never work. If he is home, he wants his food
>>> immediately. And
>>> that wouldn't stop him from leaving to go elsewhere to eat."
>>
>> Thanks for doing the leg work on that one. I didn`t think that I was
>> imagining that she had said that, but I was not going to go back through
>> several thousands of her posts to prove that she had indeed posted that.
>> She is not the first person in use net to have accused me of lying
>> about something that they had said when they did in fast say it.
>
>
> How's this for legwork:
>
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/...843/Julie-Bove
>
> Evelyn - 18 Jan 2009 14:41 GMT
>> To me they are looking at it all wrong.
>
> In the past I seldom replied to Julie, but occasionally she posted
> something
> I felt I could offer something towards. She ALWAYS rejects out of hand,
> whatever advice anyone offers. I have never seen her respond favorably
> to
> any persons advice or even offer thanks for caring to write. It is
> always
> the same thing, a rejection with a complicated explanation of her self
> imposed lifestyle and food restrictions.
>
> That made me realize that it is some kind of a game with her; a game where
> she takes power by rejecting others who reach out to her. I simply
> unmasked the game by calling her on the anomalies in her own postings. So
> now I am a bad guy? I don't think so.
>
> All this came about on alt.food.diabetic, which is a food newsgroup. She
> said certain things, and I challenged her on the comments she'd made,
> using
> her own words and her own admissions to point out that there was no sense
> in
> what she said. This morning she denies it all, but it is there for all
> to
> see.
>
> I don't believe it is supportive or helping, to let those things go
> unchallenged. You gave a prime example in "the sky is blue" analogy.
> When I challenged her, she responded saying that she HAS no
> philosophy.....
> which would even more, indicate a game-playing scenario.
>
> For people with neurotic food issues, it is all about controlling their
> world, and all about manipulating people. And then getting mad when
> people
> don't want to be manipulated.
>
> I will probably not reply to Julie again, unless she lies about what
> happened again.....

I don't even know what you're talking about. But if you don't reply to me
it will probably make me happy!