PING Squertz! A question
On Dec 9, 2:32*pm, Tommy Joe > wrote:
> * * * I thought of the idea way back when I first came in contact with
> other people's cell phones. *At home using the landline I am not
> bothered by the curly cables, I just don't notice them, only the
> comfort of the large phone and the way it's contoured to fit the
> head. *In that regard it is superior to the cellphone. *It does not
> surprise me that they already have a "dock" for an iphone that mimics
> the old fashioned phone. *But it can't just be any large phone. *I
> have a large phone on my answering machine and it's garbage. *It
> slides off my head. *I don't use except for when I'm expecting a call
> and I'm in the kitchen or bathroom. *For the cellhpone to work within
> a house-phone housing, it would have to be a princess phone or one
> that is close to that design for comfort and ease. *I'm not that much
> of a dinosaur, they can keep the rotary dial, I like the buttons.
> See, I'm not so old fashioned after all - I just know what good is -
> and I'm telling you the home landline phone is superior to to any
> cellphone for sound and comfort. *Of course it lacks in other areas,
> but again, why not have both if the cost is not too high. *Thanks for
> the update.
>
> TJ
Talking on one of those little bar-shaped cells does feel kinda
sissified. One holds it like a fancy tea cup. I have a old business
phone at the office that I think is the cat's meow. It has buttons for
dialing and lines and 18 speed dial numbers! As an extra bonus you can
slam that receiver down, no problem. Unfortunately, thanks to the cell
phone's mobility, I hardly ever sit a my desk.
I agree - the old phones were more suitable for guys and anyone that
appreciates the substantial. Too bad the younger generation won't ever
know the way of the landlines.
|