On Dec 31, 11:35*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On Dec 31, 11:03*am, ItsJoanNotJoann >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 31, 10:23*am, Bryan > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 30, 12:54*pm, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 30, 10:23*am, ItsJoanNotJoann >
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 30, 11:58*am, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Put down a fat layer of onion on the bottom of the pot. * Rubbed the
> > > > > > pork with pepper and garlic and put it on the onions. * Added about 2
> > > > > > T of liquid smoke drizzled over the roast. * I'm going to leave it on
> > > > > > high for about 2 hours and then turn it down to low for another 8
> > > > > > hours.
>
> > > > > > Pulled pork coming tonight !
>
> > > > > It will be tender and delicious but I'm assuming you don't have a
> > > > > kettle grill such as a Weber? *Or is the weather too nasty where you
> > > > > are to be outside smoking a pork butt?
>
> > > > yeah....way to nasty right now to bother firing up a bbq.... * the
> > > > liquid smoke....just a bit....will give the same effect
>
> > > Sure, just like opening up a can of Chef Boyardee spaghetti and
> > > meatballs "will give the same effect" as making it from scratch. *It
> > > amazes me that someone who used to get paid to cook could make such a
> > > stupid statement.
>
> > > --Bryan
>
> > You too; sheath your claws. *You read where he said the weather is
> > nasty in his neck of the woods. *Crockpot pork will be tasty.
>
> She wrote something idiotic, which was that Liquid Smoke in the
> crockpot "will give the same effect" as smoking it in a Weber kettle.
>
> --Bryan
>
>

I know, I know. But it's her pork butt to do with as she pleases and
if done properly liquid smoke can give some amazing results
'indoors.' If I lived close to her and got an invite to share this
dish I certainly wouldn't refuse!