sf wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:35:38 -0500, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Yup. That's my thought. Although, I guess it is not a good idea
>> because it would defeat the "flourless" part.
>
> When they talk about flourless, I think they mean "wheat".
> Alternative types of flour is only just starting to go mainstream.
>
But after thinking about it, that would still probably defeat the
whole purpose of making these.

--
Jean B.