On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:25:49 -0800 (PST), Giusi
> wrote:

>On Mar 1, 4:18*pm, marco > wrote:
>> I think some of you are automatically responding,
>> without really giving it much thought.
>>
>> My contention is, it's not the food,
>> it's you/me that are in a different psychological
>> state, and the food tastes different. Maybe better,
>> but [again] it's not necessarily the food.
>>
>> We've all heard "it tastes better the next day"
>> and sort of go along with it, and say it.
>> Not many of you seem to be absorbing this idea,
>> and responding to this concept.
>>
>> Sure, I could be totally wrong,
>> but I'd like to follow through with this idea,
>> and get thoughts on it, specifically.
>>
>> marc
>
>Sorry, I think I know my own mind about foods. The things I think are
>better are better to me. I am not contemplating my navel, I am a cook
>and it is necessary that I know this. Yes, you are wrong, I agree.
>No one said EVERYTHING was better.

One of those times I have to concur with Giusi... many, many foods are
better the next day, even the next week. Compote doesn't really come
into it's own for at least a week. Many booze soaked baked goods;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq3ARokNF_A