marco wrote:

> I think some of you are automatically responding,
> without really giving it much thought.

I think your post shows a complete lack of thought.


> My contention is, it's not the food,
> it's you/me that are in a different psychological
> state, and the food tastes different. Maybe better,
> but [again] it's not necessarily the food.

Your contention is wrong.


> We've all heard "it tastes better the next day"
> and sort of go along with it, and say it.
> Not many of you seem to be absorbing this idea,
> and responding to this concept.

That's completely wrong.


> Sure, I could be totally wrong,
> but I'd like to follow through with this idea,
> and get thoughts on it, specifically.

You're totally wrong. End of story. There *are* foods which taste better
the next day. Insulting RFC isn't going to change that, it's only going
to make you look more and more stupid.

Bob