Krypsis wrote:
>
> Riddle me this... If I boil water on a stove in an uncovered pot, why
> will it eventually boil dry if, as we have been told by Brooklyn, no
> steam is being produced? If no steam is being produced, we cannot be
> having any loss of liquid, can we?
>
> Wait, maybe Brooklyn is wrong? Could that be possible? Did he flunk JHS
> science classes? Maybe some new discovery has been made that turns the
> old theory that I learnt on its head in more recent times?

And what's up with a "steamy bathroom" after taking a long shower?

Gary