On 10/03/2012 1:13 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:15:03 +1100, >
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/03/2012 3:57 PM, Sky wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2012 8:43 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> "Christopher M." wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just added a drop of maple syrup to some cola.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that what Moxie tastes like?
>>>>
>>>> I've no idea, what's Moxie?
>>>>
>>>> One of my neighbors makes maple syrup from his own trees, he produces
>>>> only a couple gallons a year... takes 40 gllons of sap for 1 gallon of
>>>> syrup. He makes a enough for his own use and to give some small
>>>> bottles as gifts... just gave me some of last years crop... delicious:
>>>> http://i44.tinypic.com/xe4eft.jpg
>>>
>>> If your neighbor made his own maple syrup and gave only a few small
>>> bottles as gifts to friends, then why/how did your neighbor get that
>>> 'tamper proof' cap on the bottle you show in your photo?? Just curious.
>>>
>>> I have a bottle purchased at a local gourmet shop very similar to the
>>> one you show in the photo you shared (link listed above in quoted text).
>>> My photo is here ---> http://oi39.tinypic.com/2h573sw.jpg<-- -
>>> however, the two different bottles may not hold the same volume.
>>>
>>> The 'other side' of the detached label from my similar bottle of maple
>>> syrup says, "Butternut Mountain Farm, Morrisville, Vermont, 05661" along
>>> with their phone numbers. It's a wee bottle of only 1.7 fl. oz. (50 ML).
>>> The price tag was $3.99, and that's from a couple years ago or more.
>>>
>>> Sky
>>>
>> He has used old bottles for refilling. Remember, it's not a factory
>> production and a couple of gallons isn't a lot. He probably had some
>> bottles given to him or just what's been collected over time.
>>
>> I was wondering why Sheldon would post a pic of home made maple syrup as
>> there appears no benefit to anyone or anything (except his ego). It's a
>> "refilled" maple syrup bottle with no label. For all we know Sheldon
>> could have removed the label himself from a "new" bottle, "invented" the
>> story and posted the pic to lend it some credence. Certainly we aren't
>> able to do a taste test. The pic is a waste of effort.
>
> Krypsis (FAKE name)

Yes, Krypsis is a pseudonym and it is fake in that it bears no
resemblance to my real name just as much as "Brooklyn" bears no
resemblance to yours! So what's your point?


> is a total waste of protoplasm... to date you've
> not even once posted something on topic... you SICK PARANOID IGNORANT
> *******!

At least I'm not paranoid enough to believe that I need to back up every
post I make with a "proof". Your comments here prove also that you are
the ignorant ******* here, a fact borne out by the views expressed by
many other RFC posters.
>
> And that bottle does indeed have a label, it's a small clear label on
> the other side... I'm not going to publicly display the name, adress,
> and phone number of the person.
> This is all yoose get:
> http://i39.tinypic.com/5phczp.jpg

Frankly, who in hell wants to see a picture of a "relabeled" bottle
with indeterminate contents? My point about the label, or more
pointedly, its absence in the FIRST PIC you posted, is that it tells us
nothing that we couldn't determine from your text. The pic is
superfluous and your second pic, with half a label, is no better. Why
post it? Does your insecurity create in you a pressing need to PROVE
that your little tale is true? You pic doesn't manage even that much.
For all we know, you could have printed up a dummy label and stuck it on
the bottle yourself.

If ever the good folks at RFC needed any proof that you are paranoid,
these recent posts of yours are it!

--

Krypsis