On 15/03/2012 2:29 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> > wrote in
> :
>
>> On 3/14/2012 6:38 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan,
>>> however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what
>>> something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very
>>> pedestrian life.
>>
>>
>> Which is why I asked about any pending tasting samples, about which
>> you consistently demur. I'm left with no option but to use the only
>> venue left, appearance, which was dreadful.
>
>
> You bang on avbout 'samples' and don't give me an address to send them
> to (and highly unlikely you would!!), so therefore, one can only assume
> you're full of shit when you're talking about it.

That's samples to EVERYONE who reads RFC. You'll be spending quite some
time in the kitchen and down at the post office!
>
> And once again, you make an *ass*umption based on a (generally reported)
> photo with bad lighting. More fool you.

You made an "ass"umption that **** poor photography could in some way
compensate for bad food preparation and presentation. The greatest fool
here is you.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very*
>>> tasty.
>>
>> Glad for ya, sport! Unfortunately, your assertion is unprovable.
>
>
> As is yours..... but that part will never come into the argument, will
> it? LOL!!!
>
Based on the poor presentation of your "product" and suitably "enhanced"
by poor lighting and even poorer photography, your assertion needs no
further proof. It is plainly evident to all.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did.
>>
>> I've seen people eat some strange things in my time, so your brag may
>> be a bit empty.
>
>
> It's not a brag.

You wanted plaudits, you received brickbats! You cracked the sads! It
was a brag!
>
> It's a statement.
>
A statement that was "read" by all and which provided confirmation of
your poor cooking skills.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats
>>> the same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your
>>> uninformed comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on
>>> here, who, at the end of the day, are showing how immature and
>>> bigotted they are.
>>
>> Nothing points up immaturity and bigotry like your comment right
>> there.
>
>
>
> Oh dear!! That point hit a home run, and we didn't like it, did we??!!
> LOL!!!
>
Home run? I sincerely doubt it. It just showed all on RFC just how
childish you really are. Now run along sonny and go play with people who
will pander to your deflated ego.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Are you a bigot?
>>
>> You're bigoted enough for both of us, hon.
>
>
> Your non-compliance to a straight yes or no question is duly noted.
>
> I wouldn't say I was a bigot, honey, I like everyone and anything till
> you **** me off.
>
> You, on the other hand, along with the other bigots on here, show your
> true colours with your posts.
>
You are indeed showing yours now!

>>
>>> Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ??
>>
>> Unlike you, yes, I am! I don't understand why you're taking this so
>> hard.
>
> I'm not, it's you morons that can't accept the truth about yourselves.
>
Like you can't accept the truth about your disastrous mashed spuds!
>
>>
>>> BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about
>>> food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest
>>> so no 'judges' are required. You are stood down.
>>
>> I didn't mention judging first. You did.
>
> LOL!!! Semantics..... the first sign that you have lost the argument.
>
>> Yes, this group is about food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of
>> it. Eating is done with the eyes. Presentation is everything. The pic
>> of those potatoes that you ever so proudly provided--and believe me,
>> we could tell you were beaming and busting your buttons--
>
>
>
> You *could*!! LOL!!!
>
>
> You make up whatever shit you want to help your bigotry along, honey, it
> probably helps you to sleep better at night knowing you're such a person
> of 'high standards' and principles, doesn't it sweetie?
>
Judging by your comments, you have no such high standards. Certainly you
display little intellect!
>
>
>
>> made them
>> look like lumpy pallid pudding. Those potatoes were unappetizing and
>> dreadful to look at. If you hadn't told us they were mashed potatoes,
>> we probably wouldn't have been able to identify what it was at all.
>
>
> Which just goes to show you are a pedestrian cook/eater.
>
Nobody would have been able to identify your mashed spuds. That's
because they were (a) lumpy and (b) hidden by the glop you put on them.
You ascribed the lumpiness to having cooked the spuds with skin on.
Nobody makes mashed potatoes with potato skins in the mix because it
well and truly stuffs up the creamy texture mashed spuds are supposed to
have. No wonder you secreted your mash under copious quantities of glop.
>
>
>> Sorry you can't deal with it.
>>
>
>
> ROFLMAO!!!
>
> It's you bigotted morons who can't deal with it!!!
>
>
You, after being told so many times by so many different people, still
cannot deal with it.

--

Krypsis