Steve wrote:

>>>> http://tinypic.com/m/fcv8rs/3
>>>
>>> You have such girlish hands that they look like they've never done a
>>> hard days work in their entire life. All this talk of, "...in the
>>> bush for 4 weeks at a time" - didn't you take your hands with you?
>>> Looks like they stayed home.
>>>
>>>> http://tinypic.com/m/fcv8s1/3
>>>
>>> They don't even look human. they look all mangled, or fake, or...
>>> something. Coupon Suzy's hands would look better on you - they're
>>> much more manly than those.
>>>
>>> If I was you I would legally change the name of my hands.
>>
>> How do you know they're not Ruth's hands?
>
> The wrinkles at the wrist suggest that the person holding the fish is
> the same one holding the camera.
>
> And there is no shadow of a person standing on his left, where the
> main light source seems to be located.
>
> And he didn't deny it in his followup. You know if he had an excuse
> he would have used it.
>
> Do you really think Ruth is participating in Peter's UseNet
> photography ruse? What are the chances that they share some sort of
> psychotic link VIA subliminal telepathy?

I suppose you're right, and it does behoove Swallows to keep her hands
soft and dainty for the diggers who can only afford that.

Bob