On Apr 21, 7:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:44:05 -1000, dsi1 wrote:
> > On 4/21/2012 6:25 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:48:09 -1000, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >>> On 4/21/2012 5:42 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:46:08 -1000, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >>>>> You'll have different responses from guys that think their method is the
> >>>>> best so the reality is that you'd have to pick one anyway. I won't give
> >>>>> you my method because I don't need the grief from people that think
> >>>>> their method is the best and my method is stupid. :-)
>
> >>>> All that guessing you do and you don't want to express your opinions
> >>>> on cooking a rib roast?
>
> >>> You're losing your touch. I've already discussed this exhaustively on
> >>> this NG. There's no point in me adding to the chatter. Just Google it..
> >>> In your case - just Bing it. Ahahahahahaha!
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.f...a021142a04a21?....
>
> >> I'm not impressed. *You guessed wrong.
>
> > You just need to do more research Google-boy. I thought you had
> > everything archived and indexed. I'm so not impressed. You disappoint me.
>
> After that stupid comment you made about "temperature doesn't make a
> difference" I have no desire to see what other stupidity you have
> recommended. **I* already know how to cook a rib roast (and I of
> course have the pictures to prove it).
>
> I was just surprised how tight-lipped you were.
>
> -sw

This subject has been covered many times in this group - genius. You
like to tell others to search the archives but you can't do the
simplest of searches. So much your all your "archiving" of this and
other groups on your stinking hard drives. I guess that makes all the
shit on your drives worthless. The king of Usenet strikes out again.
I'll let you be the one to endlessly post redundant material. Just
don't expect me to.