Sqwertz wrote:

> > Again with the generic "sugar". That such a vague term is allowed rather
> > than specific detail as to exactly which kind of sugar or sugars are
> > included is a huge flaw in the nutritional label regulations.
>
> AFAIK, "sugar" only applies to beet and cane sugar according to the

I think sqwish is correct. When a label says "sugar", it means
sucrose.