you obviously have no arguement. less meat consumed, less animals
produced/bred. period. when you can see past your own 'infallible' ideas,
try again. until then, enjoy being right.

"rick etter" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "hamilton" > wrote in message
> ...
> > you're right. you're not doing anything by not eating meat. BUT. you
> aren't
> > contributing. that's my proof.
> =====================
> Doesn't work. Any number of other things you use use the by-products of
> those animals. Besides, why only the concern for animals that others are
> eating, and no concern for the animals that you kill and leave to rot?
You
> are contributing to massive, brutal, inhumane death and suffering of
animals
> for your veggies. You *could* reduce those numbers by selecting the right
> kinds of meat, but since you have that simple rule/ simple mind thing down
> so pat I guess you religion has taken over.
>
>
> i'm not eating meat. the meat industry isn't
> > working for me. very simple. i'm not changing the world. i'm not doing
> much
> > of anything. but maybe one less animal a year is killed because of me.
> ====================
> That's the point idiot. You're probably killing even *more* animals than
if
> you just ate the right kinds of meat. Plus, you've never proven this
> delusion, again.
>
> if
> > that happens, than this whole thing has a slight purpose. not only is my
> > diet healthy for me (reduced fats/carcinogens) but i MIGHT be helping
> > something else. what an amasing concept. nothing in this world is
> concrete.
> > proove anything.
> ================
> What's amazing is how you've managed to ignore the truth and wrap it into
> the typical vegan delusions. The problem is that you are killing more
> animals with your diet, hypocrite.
>
> >
> >
> > "rick etter" > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> > >
> > > "hamilton" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > are you suggesting we eat nothing?
> > > ====================
> > > No
> > >
> > > or meat only?
> > > ==============
> > > no
> > >
> > > or everything?
> > > ==============
> > > yes
> > >
> > > Why can't people just eat what they want, and not try to build their
> lives
> > > around food?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > by taking a
> > > > stance in refusing animal products, we're doing better than the
person
> > to
> > > > eat the fish AND the rice (to use your example).
> > > ==================
> > > Prove that little delusion. It's a ly. All vegans have is a simple
> rule
> > > for their simple minds, 'eat no meat.' Why do you think that
excluding
> > > meat automatically means you are causing less animal death and
> suffering?
> > > Propaganda? Brainwashing?
> > >
> > >
> > > i don't know what the
> > > > problem is. well maybe i do... too many preaching vegans, it sounds
> > like.
> > > i
> > > > understand that. it ****es me off just as much, but this isn't quite
> the
> > > > forum for that. if you have something to contribute, go for it. but
it
> > > seems
> > > > to me all you're doing is being a dickhead.
> > > =====================
> > > Why? because you don't like the message? what part of it don't you
> > > understand? Prove you're claim above.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > ====================
> > > > > But like most vegans, you don't want to know about the death and
> > > suffering
> > > > > behind the foods you want to eat, right? Why do you assume that
> foods
> > > > with
> > > > > micro-bits of animals in them are somehow automatically less cruel
> > than
> > > > any
> > > > > food without any bits in it? I'd say that the bed of rice you
have
> > > > > underneath your fish has caused more overall death and suffering
> than
> > > the
> > > > > fish on top does. But then, that's the typical veg*n ploy, focus
> only
> > > on
> > > > > the foods that include meat, and ignore the blood dripping from
the
> > > > veggies.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks again.
> > > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>