"Hell Toupee" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/7/2012 10:02 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Hell > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/7/2012 8:47 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "A Moose in > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> I understand that raw milk has a higher probability of containing
>>>>> pathogens than pasteurized milk.
>>>>> Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens?
>>>>
>>>> All depends on how it is stored. It's not the miit is the vessel.
>>>> More
>>>> people get sick from pasteurized milk every year.
>>>
>>> And the vessel includes the cow it came from, specifically, its teats.
>>
>> Humans have consumed raw milk for a long time. Keep the teet clean and
>> you
>> don't have problems.
>
> Humans have suffered from tuberculosis and other diseases for millenia,
> too. Same as parasitic infections from meat consumption. You seem to buy
> into the delusion that nature is by default pure and it is human practices
> that are the problem. That simply isn't true. Of course, if you want to
> pretend that unsafe practices are safe simply because they're traditional,
> you're got to delude yourself.


Another hyper paranoid asshole with his panties in a twist over milk this
time. I look at the calendar. Yep, same shit different day. Excuse me, I
have to go to the doctor. Seems I picked up a case of bubonic plague eating
steak tartar. It happens.

Paul