"hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> are you suggesting we eat nothing?
====================
No

or meat only?
==============
no

or everything?
==============
yes

Why can't people just eat what they want, and not try to build their lives
around food?



by taking a
> stance in refusing animal products, we're doing better than the person to
> eat the fish AND the rice (to use your example).
==================
Prove that little delusion. It's a ly. All vegans have is a simple rule
for their simple minds, 'eat no meat.' Why do you think that excluding
meat automatically means you are causing less animal death and suffering?
Propaganda? Brainwashing?


i don't know what the
> problem is. well maybe i do... too many preaching vegans, it sounds like.
i
> understand that. it ****es me off just as much, but this isn't quite the
> forum for that. if you have something to contribute, go for it. but it
seems
> to me all you're doing is being a dickhead.
=====================
Why? because you don't like the message? what part of it don't you
understand? Prove you're claim above.


>
>
> > ====================
> > But like most vegans, you don't want to know about the death and
suffering
> > behind the foods you want to eat, right? Why do you assume that foods
> with
> > micro-bits of animals in them are somehow automatically less cruel than
> any
> > food without any bits in it? I'd say that the bed of rice you have
> > underneath your fish has caused more overall death and suffering than
the
> > fish on top does. But then, that's the typical veg*n ploy, focus only
on
> > the foods that include meat, and ignore the blood dripping from the
> veggies.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks again.
> > > Robert
> >
> >
>
>