"hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> you're right. you're not doing anything by not eating meat. BUT. you
aren't
> contributing. that's my proof.
=====================
Doesn't work. Any number of other things you use use the by-products of
those animals. Besides, why only the concern for animals that others are
eating, and no concern for the animals that you kill and leave to rot? You
are contributing to massive, brutal, inhumane death and suffering of animals
for your veggies. You *could* reduce those numbers by selecting the right
kinds of meat, but since you have that simple rule/ simple mind thing down
so pat I guess you religion has taken over.


i'm not eating meat. the meat industry isn't
> working for me. very simple. i'm not changing the world. i'm not doing
much
> of anything. but maybe one less animal a year is killed because of me.
====================
That's the point idiot. You're probably killing even *more* animals than if
you just ate the right kinds of meat. Plus, you've never proven this
delusion, again.

if
> that happens, than this whole thing has a slight purpose. not only is my
> diet healthy for me (reduced fats/carcinogens) but i MIGHT be helping
> something else. what an amasing concept. nothing in this world is
concrete.
> proove anything.
================
What's amazing is how you've managed to ignore the truth and wrap it into
the typical vegan delusions. The problem is that you are killing more
animals with your diet, hypocrite.

>
>
> "rick etter" > wrote in message
> link.net...
> >
> > "hamilton" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > are you suggesting we eat nothing?
> > ====================
> > No
> >
> > or meat only?
> > ==============
> > no
> >
> > or everything?
> > ==============
> > yes
> >
> > Why can't people just eat what they want, and not try to build their
lives
> > around food?
> >
> >
> >
> > by taking a
> > > stance in refusing animal products, we're doing better than the person
> to
> > > eat the fish AND the rice (to use your example).
> > ==================
> > Prove that little delusion. It's a ly. All vegans have is a simple
rule
> > for their simple minds, 'eat no meat.' Why do you think that excluding
> > meat automatically means you are causing less animal death and
suffering?
> > Propaganda? Brainwashing?
> >
> >
> > i don't know what the
> > > problem is. well maybe i do... too many preaching vegans, it sounds
> like.
> > i
> > > understand that. it ****es me off just as much, but this isn't quite
the
> > > forum for that. if you have something to contribute, go for it. but it
> > seems
> > > to me all you're doing is being a dickhead.
> > =====================
> > Why? because you don't like the message? what part of it don't you
> > understand? Prove you're claim above.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ====================
> > > > But like most vegans, you don't want to know about the death and
> > suffering
> > > > behind the foods you want to eat, right? Why do you assume that
foods
> > > with
> > > > micro-bits of animals in them are somehow automatically less cruel
> than
> > > any
> > > > food without any bits in it? I'd say that the bed of rice you have
> > > > underneath your fish has caused more overall death and suffering
than
> > the
> > > > fish on top does. But then, that's the typical veg*n ploy, focus
only
> > on
> > > > the foods that include meat, and ignore the blood dripping from the
> > > veggies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks again.
> > > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>