On Aug 2, 9:42*am, spamtrap1888 > wrote:
> On Aug 1, 3:49*pm, Bryan > wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores. *The kind of folks who'd want to support the company aren't going to want their kids exposed to same sex making out. *Or maybe...
> > "Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
> > "Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn forever in Hell for what they are doing."
>
> > Send a couple of hot, young, lipstick *******s out there, and the wives would know that their husbands were having impure thoughts. *I'd contribute a few bucks to fund to sponsor a couple of attractive women to walk back and forth in front of one of those stores, stopping to kiss at random times. *The wives wouldn't want to eat there. *Chick-Fil-A has a big problem in that their stores are primarily in metropolitan areas, where there are less backward rubes.
>
> I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
> worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
> fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
> dumpy, none are sexy.

You don't get out much do you? Chances are you really wouldn't know if
a beautiful woman was *** or not.