****wit David Harrison unsuccessfully tried to run away from his stupid
core beliefs again:

>>>>
>>>>> "Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be born..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There's no such thing as "unborn animals" you moron.
>>>
>>> LOL!!! In contrast to that most stupidly blatant of lies, every pregnant
>>> animal carries at least one unborn animal.
>>
>> Oh, so unborn animals somehow exist, then?
>
> Every pregnant animal

Not what we're talking about, ****wit - proved. Your attempt at evasion
failed. Time for you to move on to some new ****wittery.


>> That's what we've been
>> saying you believe all along. Why do you deny believing it when it is
>> so obvious that you *do* believe it?
>
> it's stupid not to believe in unborn animals just because you can't
> see them.

We're not talking about animal fetuses in stages of development,
****wit. We never were. You know it, too. Also, wobbly Woopert knows
that's not what we ever were talking about.


> What you're bewildered and confused about is the difference
> between unborn animals and potential future beings who

No confusion. In the context of your *FAILED* effort to criticize
"vegans", Goo - you are Goo, of course - "unborn animals" and "potential
future [farm animal] beings" are synonymous.