On 2012-08-20, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

> Maybe, but maybe not. What is wrong with the propellant in Pam? It
> dissipates. In the end, the lawyers are taking OUR money, not the
> big corporations.

Personally, I couldn't care less about the $$$. I'm paying more for
organic, anyway. I wanna see some truth in lableing, particularly GMO
labeling. Also, perhaps it will kill the dilution/corruption of
organic standards/labeling the agribizes are pushing for.

Yes, I know it's jes a money grab by lawers, but perhaps the consumer
will see some bennies in the fallout. We the consumers are the real
power. If you don't DEMAND truth in labeling, we will never get it.
Think of cigarettes and smoking. Yes, the shysters hurt the tobacco
lobby, financially, but it was the people who created the eventual
stigma attached to smoking and made it socially unpopular to smoke.

Which reminds me. What's with the return of ppl smoking in TV
programs and movies, again? WTF is that all about? Looks like big
tobacco is fighting back. Time fer folks to man the barricades,
again.

nb

--
Definition of objectivism:
"Eff you! I got mine."
http://www.nongmoproject.org/