View Single Post
  #420 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic
BruceS BruceS is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Dietary ethics

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:24:32 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:19:39 -0400, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:

<snip lots of stuff with dh not getting basic definitions>
>> It's what disturbs you most apparently, but if you're going to try
>> helping
>>the goos then you need to explain what you think prevents you from
>>benefitting from your life NOW.

>
> Since you're apparently just too stupid to understand what anyone else
> says, which fact makes it clear that your assertions and demands are not
> only irrelevant but "not even wrong", I'm through with you. Enjoy your
> ignorance in isolation.


I don't know whether to celebrate or mourn. I've been amazed at how long
you (and others) have tried to get a very simple point across. Not that
I'm claiming any superior approach. I've been missing my favorite loon
enough that I've started reading some of dh and BroilJAB.

Brian of Norway! Where have you gone! We could all use your voice in
this sea of insanity. Until Graham gets back, that is. At this point,
even the Insane Lying Nazi (aka Zook the Kook) would be entertaining.
For a little while.