On Oct 1, 12:31*pm, "graham" > wrote:
> "John H. Gohde" > wrote in ...
> On Oct 1, 8:52 am, "graham" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Mark Thorson" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > > The NPA represents manufacturers of natural foods
> > > and dietary supplements. They've got lots of reasons
> > > to oppose this proposition.
>
> > >http://www.npainfo.org/NPA/Advocacy/...t_Prop_37.aspx
>
> > > Mostly, they oppose it because they would be its
> > > main victims, not Monsanto. It's basically a hunting
> > > license for lawyers looking to make a fast buck.
>
> > The term "natural" in the quack remedy and food supplement business is the
> > most misused term out there.
> > Graham
>
> Perhaps, if you were to focus. *The topic is GMO food labeling!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take your finger out of your arse and read the OP's first sentence!


Take your finger out of your arse and read my second reply.

Then Read what I had posted in my first reply, again.

Perhaps, if you were to focus? The topic is still GMO food labeling!
Whether or NOT the definition of "natural" has anything to do with it,
is highly debatable.

For sure, it is NOT what NPA has suggested.

I have read both analyzes of Prop 37, as well as the entire text of
it. What the NPA is maintaining is pure bunk.

So, Take your finger out of your arse! Arse