"jmcquown" > wrote in message
> On 12/22/2012 6:28 AM, Farm1 wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That
>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>>
>>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>>
>>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>>
>>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension
>>>> or
>>>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>>
>>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>>
>> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
>> rude.
>>
>>
> It was notbob who suggested mashing them together. (All I said was
> "tatties & neeps", with no mention of how to prepare them.)

I know it was notbob who suggested it as you will see if you reread my
posts. I also know you didn't mention how you prepared them.

If Ophelia is going to be consistent rather than just aiming to impress with
her words, you too will also be told to keep dancing for pointing out that
someone did indeed say it. You won't be though.