On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:09:06 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Plimpton >:

>On 12/31/2012 8:58 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:15:13 -0500, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:58:02 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>
>>>> his insistence that *all* those on his list are your nyms is a
>>>> thin mask
>>>
>>> LOL!!!
>>
>> Stop giggling; it makes you sound even more stupid than the
>> idiocies you post (if that's even possible).
>
>****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - has driven that into the ground. He
>used to use a lot of other trite, hackneyed Usenet expressions, e.g.
>"imo", but "LOL!!!" is by far his favorite.
>
>The other trite, hackneyed bits of garbage he beats into the ground are
>some really bizarre constructions, e.g. "how do you want people to think
>that...", "in contrast to ...", "anti-consideration", and some others.
>
>Here's what you need to keep in mind. ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* -
>is at most a high school graduate; it's not established that he
>completed high school. He grew up in the rural south. He says he
>originally is from somewhere else, but most of his youth was in the
>rural south - Georgia - and he never left. He is the epitome of every
>negative stereotype of stupid, dimwitted southern anti-intellectualism.
> ****wit would have been right at home with the creationism bigotry
>involved in the prosecution of John Thomas Scopes; also with the
>"execution" of Mary the elephant
>(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_%28elephant%29).
>
>****wit is just stupid - his stupidity, like that of most ignorant
>crackers, is by choice.

Just a minor nit: Ignorance is by choice. Stupidity isn't,
and is a "forever" thing. From his posts I suspect he's
both.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless