On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:40:25 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:

>On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:54:59 -0700, probably Goo wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:12:31 -0500, the following appeared
>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>>>On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:40:21 -0800, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>
>>>>You know that Bob is not me.
>>>
>>> LOL!!!! That is the most blatant of lies Goober. IF "Bob" is not you
>>
>>I'm not, and I suspect that somewhere in that pea brain of
>>yours you know it,
>
> LOL!!! There's no way I could know

Granted, there's probably no way *you* could know it.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless