Dietary ethics
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:14 -0800, Goo wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:15:13 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:58:02 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>
>>>his insistence that *all* those on his list are your nyms is a
>>>thin mask
>>
>> LOL!!! They are all "different" people Goo has dishonestly pretended to be
>>over the years. You're right to think it's lowlife and contemptible because it
>>is, but Goo DID do it because that's what he is. If you're not Goo and you deny
>>to yourself what he did then it's because you don't want to accept what a
>>contemptible person the Goober is, but he still IS that way even if you fool
>>yourself into thinking he's not. LOL...HE fooled you into thinking he's not, but
>>you let yourself be fooled also. If you're not Goo you are both at fault and Goo
>>has successfully tricked you so he's one up on you big time. And all I'm doing
>>is pointing out what Goo did to you...LOL....IF you're not Goo....
>>
>>>created to foster the belief in others that no one
>>>but you disagrees with him.
>>
>> I didn't make Goo pretend to be the dozens of "different" people I've got on
>>the list, or the probably 4+ times MORE he has also dishonestly pretended to be
>>that I'm not aware of and don't have on the list.
>
>not all of them.
I'm aware I didn't list all of them Goob. Do you think I've got ten percent
on the list, or less than that, Goo?
>>There are also quite a few I
>>know of that I don't have on the list, like he has dishonestly posted as me, and
>>as Ron Hamilton, and countless other people who do exist and he dishonestly
>>pretended to be in addition to all the others.
>>
>> All eliminationists agree with Goo that the lives of livestock should not be
>>given as much or more consideration than their deaths, but all people who have
>>come through the forum who honestly favor decent AW over elimination have
>>naturally agreed with me.
|