On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:21 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:40:42 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:15:57 -0800, Goo lied:
>>
>>>*all* the serious opponents of "ar" disagreed with his cracker idiocy
>>
>> That's a lie Goo but try pretending they did. What do you want to pretend
>>they disagreed with me about?
>
>No. John Mercer,

He never did.

>Martin Martens,

He never did.

>Ward Clark,

He said he didn't agree but never gave a single reason why not.

>diderot,

diderot not only didn't disagree, but he agreed that the animals' lives
should be taken into consideration.

>Rick Etter,

He said he didn't agree but didn't give any reason why not either.

>and of course Dutch and I

"Dutch" was honest about the fact that he's an eliminationist when he
started posting:

"It's wrong to exploit animals by breeding, confining and
killing them." - "Dutch"

"abstaining from meat saves future animals from life" - "Dutch"

"What's important is the medium/long term implications,
that is no more animals "in bondage" to humans." - "Dutch"

"you should become a vegan. I've been saying that to you
for years." - "Dutch"

"I am an animal rights believer." - "Dutch"

"we must have at least the same right as every animal does,
which is to seek to compete successfully, sustain ourselves
and thrive." - "Dutch"

and I don't believe he ever got over it. I've never had any reason to believe
you favor AW over elimination, but if you do you're probably the stupidest
mother ****er who has ever posted anything about the subject. Not just ignorant,
but ignorant and very impressively STUPID!