Dietary ethics
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:10 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Plimpton >:
>On 12/30/2012 10:15 AM, *Goo* - ****wit David Harrison - lied:
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:58:02 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>
>>> No problem, a lot of people use multiple nyms for various
>>> reasons, and the only group I know that forbids nymshifting
>>> is talk.origins (because so many jerks use them to avoid
>>> killfiles), and even t.o accepts *changing* a nym. But his
>>> insistence that *all* those on his list are your nyms is a
>>> thin mask created to foster the belief in others that no one
>>> but you disagrees with him.
>>
>> LOL!!!
>
>LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
He does use that a lot, doesn't he? I was always a bit vague
regarding the meaning of "lollygagging" until I realized all
his LOLing was gagging me...
>> They are all "different" people George has dishonestly pretended to
>No, *Goo*. Many of them are nyms I've used - in fact, the majority of
>them - but not all of them. Your ignorant cracker ****wittery has led
>you to **** up *again*, *Goo*. Again and again and again.
>
>LOL!!!!!!!!!
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|