On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:20:06 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:

>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:10:48 -0500, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>
>>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:38:33 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:40:25 -0500, the following appeared
>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:54:59 -0700, probably Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:12:31 -0500, the following appeared
>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:40:21 -0800, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You know that Bob is not me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL!!!! That is the most blatant of lies Goober. IF "Bob" is not you
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not, and I suspect that somewhere in that pea brain of
>>>>>yours you know it,
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! There's no way I could know
>>>
>>>Granted, there's probably no way *you* could know it.
>>
>> Hmmm. Since I've never known Goo to be that honest in over a dozen years of
>>reading his lies, that's some evidence you're not Goo.
>
>It wasn't a compliment or

LOL!!! YOU being honest about something seems like a compliment to the other
person from your pov. LOL...HILARIOUS. That almost convinces me you ARE Goo.
From here on unless something significant indicates you might not be, I'll take
it for granted you're Goo. Who else would be dishonest and stupid enough "think"
the way you do?

>anything similar, it was a note
>regarding your many-times-demonstrated inabilities to
>comprehend damn near anything.
>
>> Still you can't say what
>>you want people to think is preventing life from being a benefit to you
>
>Already done so.

What do you want people to think is preventing you from benefitting from
life? Why can't you say? Why is all you can do lie that you've already told us,
when if you had tried I'd probably be laughing at that rather than constantly
challenging you to try explaining what you want people to think it is?

>The fact that you think there's some
>nebulous "benefit" in being born with a painful . . . A short life of nothing but pain
>isn't a "benefit".

This is yet more evidence that you ARE Goo. I know from previous experience
that Goo can't acknowledge and probably can't even appreciate the distinction
between these two definitions of the word:
__________________________________________________ _______
1 b : a principle or force that is considered to underlie the
distinctive quality of animate beings

2 a : the sequence of physical and mental experiences that make
up the existence of an individual

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/life
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
LOL...and if you can't then again you are uniquely stupid in a way that so far
has been resticted only to Goo and maybe his boy "Dutch". In case you are that
stupid, the life I point out is a benefit is the first definition, while the
second is not always a benefit of course. But if you can't appreciate the
distinction between the meanings, you also can't appreciate the distinction
between one being a benefit always and the other not always.

>>, and so
>>far only you and Goo are in that incredibly stupid position. It's hard enough to
>>believe even one person is that stupid, much less two people. Let's give you
>>another chance to try to defend your claim:
>>
>> Do you think no prerequisites are benefits, or that some are but life is one
>>that's not?
>
>Prerequisites are just that: Requirements

Do you think no prerequisites are benefits, or that some are but life is one
that's not? LOL...now that we mention it, life might be one of he few
prerequisites that IS also a benefit.

>that must be met
>before something else can happen:
>
>From the AHD:
>
>pre·req·ui·site (pr¶-rµk“w¹-z¹t) adj. 1. Required or
>necessary as a prior condition.
>
>> What do you think distinguishes those that are from those that
>>aren't, do you have any clue at all?
>
>ben·e·fit (bµn“…-f¹t) n. 1.a. Something that promotes or
>enhances well-being; an advantage.

Try to explain what you want people to think prevents life from being a
benefit from you. If you can't explain why you want us to think life in general
is not, then try explaining how you want us to think your life in particular is
not. Go: