On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:11:27 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:46:37 -0700, Janet Bostwick
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:00:28 -0800, sf > wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:03:23 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:36:43 -0800, sf > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Both parties are corrupt. Take your choice of who you want to take
>> >> >> your money.
>> >> >
>> >> >My choice is the party that looks out more for me.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, I didn't know there was a new party making serious inroads. The
>> >> two major ones look out only for themselves.
>> >
>> >The one I chose looks out for me and would do more if the party of NO
>> >choose to do some work in Washington instead of spend their time
>> >taking handouts from lobbyists and big business.
>>
>> The crazy people have to be voted out first. It doesn't look like
>> that is going to happen soon.
>> Janet US
>
>Unfortunately, they gerrimandered nice safe districts in 2010 so we
>have to wait for the next census to make it right. Hopefully, they
>don't wreck the country in the mean time.

The census isn't going to fix it . . . they are currently in process
of redistricting Virginia, Pennsylvania and plans for Wisconsin, Ohio
and Iowa. Since they control the legislature and the governor, the
process is not in doubt. What it does is fixes it so that even if the
one party has way more votes than the other, there is absolutely no
way that party will be able to get enough electoral votes to even come
close to winning.
Janet US