FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:09:24 +0100, Derek > wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:05:24 GMT, wrote:
>>
>>[..]
>>
>>> The meat industry provides life for the animals that it
>>>slaughters, and the animals live and die in it as they do
>>>in any other habitat. They also depend on it for their
>>>lives like the animals in any other habitat. If people
>>>consume animal products from animals they think are
>>>raised in decent ways, they will be promoting life for
>>>more such animals in the future.
>>
>>Most meatarians justify their diet using the same logic
>>you use,
>
>
> They know that what I point out is true.

We know that what you say, not "point out", is
worthless bullshit.

>
>>and they use it because they intuitively know
>>they are doing something terribly wrong when eating
>>rights-holding farmed animals.
>
>
> That could only be true if there were rights-holding
> farmed animals, but there are none.
>
>
>>You don't get to see vegans arguing we should all eat
>>veg on the basis that such a diet provides life for more
>>cabbages,
>
>
> No. You argue we should all eat veg to prevent the
> lives and deaths of billions of animals.

And you argue we should all eat meat to CAUSE the lives
of billions of animals. Your advice is stupid.

>
>
>>do you, and that's because we all know that
>>the life and death of a cabbage is morally meaningless.
>>You're an AR, Harrison, else you would not be trying
>>to morally justify the life and death of your food.
>
>
> No

Yes. At heart, ****wit, you are an "ara".