On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:03:05 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote:

> On Mar 30, 11:43*pm, sf > wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:57:36 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > One that you use all the time or for special occassions or just for
> > > decoration?
> >
> > > The New York Times wants to see. * Here's an interactive feature and
> > > there are some
> > > really gorgeous bowls there already. * Send your picture.
> >
> > >http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/g...html?ref=garde...
> >
> > BAH! *Those are just decorative bowls! *Not one of them is filled with
> > food.
> >
>
> I think you missed the whole point of the article and interactive.
> It is about art, and craft.
> Nobody said the bowls had to be used for food although many are if you
> read the captions.

I didn't go though it very carefully. I thought the reason it was
posted was they were supposed to hold food and that's why I went
there. None I saw were shown with food, all looked like some pot
throwers idea of art and I thought everything I saw was butt ugly, so
I had no incentive to read about them or look any more thoroughly.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.