"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:03:05 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mar 30, 11:43 pm, sf > wrote:
>> > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:57:36 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > One that you use all the time or for special occassions or just for
>> > > decoration?
>> >
>> > > The New York Times wants to see. Here's an interactive feature and
>> > > there are some
>> > > really gorgeous bowls there already. Send your picture.
>> >
>> > >http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/g...html?ref=garde...
>> >
>> > BAH! Those are just decorative bowls! Not one of them is filled with
>> > food.
>> >
>>
>> I think you missed the whole point of the article and interactive.
>> It is about art, and craft.
>> Nobody said the bowls had to be used for food although many are if you
>> read the captions.
>
> I didn't go though it very carefully. I thought the reason it was
> posted was they were supposed to hold food and that's why I went
> there. None I saw were shown with food, all looked like some pot
> throwers idea of art and I thought everything I saw was butt ugly, so
> I had no incentive to read about them or look any more thoroughly.
>
So you don't know much about art, but you know what you like{;-)
Graham