> wrote in message
...
> On Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:54:10 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>>
>> T...
>>
>> > In article >, says...
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> "Hench" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> ...
>>
>> >> > On 4/10/2013 1:15 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> >> >> "Hench" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> ...
>>
>> >> >>> On 4/8/2013 2:59 PM, bigwheel wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >> >> Bottom line, babies are not supposed to eat fish!
>>
>> >> >>
>>
>> >> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >> > You did see that the original post was about infants and not babies,
>>
>> >> > you
>>
>> >> > did see that correct?
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Infant is another word for baby. Same thing.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > No it isn't . The origin of the word means a child below the age of
>>
>> > speech. In Britain, "Infant schools" take pupils age 4 to 7.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > http://www.ranvilles-inf.hants.sch.uk/
>>
>>
>>
>> Well it certainly doesn't mean that here in the US. The terms mean the
>> same
>>
>> thing here.
>
> In case anybody is wondering whether they should trust Julie's grasp of
> word meanings, read the "processed" food thread. She's a true mongoloid.

http://dictionary.reference.com/brow...ant?s=t&path=/

"a child during the earliest period of its life, especially before he or she
can walk; baby."